Compare-Cities.com
Compare Visalia to Riverbank
This post compares Visalia, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Visalia (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,047 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $44,703 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $207,400 | $247,200 |
| White | 78% | 79% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 5% | 4% |
| With Kids | 43% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 32 |
| Rentals | 40% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Visalia or Riverbank?
A: Visalia has a much larger population count than Riverbank: 130047 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Visalia or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Visalia.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Visalia or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Visalia.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Visalia does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Visalia versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Visalia may include: Hanford, Reedley, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z