Compare-Cities.com
Compare Visalia to Atwater
This post compares Visalia, California to Atwater, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Visalia (city) | Atwater (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,047 | 29,118 |
| Income (median) | $44,703 | $35,415 |
| Home Value (median) | $207,400 | $179,400 |
| White | 78% | 58% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 5% | 4% |
| With Kids | 43% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 30 |
| Rentals | 40% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Visalia or Atwater?
A: Visalia has a much larger population count than Atwater: 130047 compared with 29118 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Visalia or in Atwater?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Visalia.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Visalia or Atwater?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Visalia.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Visalia versus 49% for Atwater.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Visalia may include: Hanford, Reedley, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z