Compare-Cities.com
Compare Visalia to Ashland
This post compares Visalia, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Visalia (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,047 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $44,703 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $207,400 | $396,400 |
| White | 78% | 44% |
| Black | 1% | 17% |
| Asian | 5% | 20% |
| With Kids | 43% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 32 |
| Rentals | 40% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Visalia or Ashland?
A: Visalia has a much larger population count than Ashland: 130047 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Visalia or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Visalia.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Visalia or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Visalia.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Visalia versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Visalia may include: Hanford, Reedley, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z