Compare-Cities.com
Compare Vallejo to South San Francisco
This post compares Vallejo, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Vallejo (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 120,599 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $48,494 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $295,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 38% | 33% |
| Black | 21% | 2% |
| Asian | 23% | 39% |
| With Kids | 33% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 44% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Vallejo or South San Francisco?
A: Vallejo has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 120599 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Vallejo or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Vallejo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Vallejo or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Vallejo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Vallejo does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Vallejo versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Vallejo may include: Richmond, Suisun-City, and Pittsburg.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z