Compare-Cities.com
Compare Upland to San Francisco
This post compares Upland, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Upland (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,155 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $50,675 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $465,200 | $927,400 |
| White | 63% | 47% |
| Black | 5% | 5% |
| Asian | 8% | 34% |
| With Kids | 31% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 44% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Upland or San Francisco?
A: Upland has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 76155 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Upland or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Upland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Upland or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Upland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Upland versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Upland may include: Concord, Santa-Rosa, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z