Compare-Cities.com
Compare Upland to San Fernando
This post compares Upland, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Upland (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,155 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $50,675 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $465,200 | $370,300 |
| White | 63% | 57% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 8% | 1% |
| With Kids | 31% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 33 |
| Rentals | 44% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Upland or San Fernando?
A: Upland has a larger population count than San Fernando: 76155 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Upland or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Upland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Upland or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Upland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Upland versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Upland may include: Concord, Santa-Rosa, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z