Compare-Cities.com
Compare Upland to Foothill Farms
This post compares Upland, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Upland (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,155 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $50,675 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $465,200 | $201,200 |
| White | 63% | 67% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 8% | 5% |
| With Kids | 31% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 33 |
| Rentals | 44% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Upland or Foothill Farms?
A: Upland has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 76155 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Upland or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Upland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Upland or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Upland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Upland versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Upland may include: Concord, Santa-Rosa, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z