Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Union City, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $322,800 |
| White | 21% | 36% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 53% | 10% |
| With Kids | 39% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 32 |
| Rentals | 34% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or South San Jose Hills?
A: Union City has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 74354 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Union City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z