Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to South San Francisco
This post compares Union City, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Union City (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 74,354 | 67,120 |
Income (median) | $55,732 | $52,696 |
Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $697,400 |
White | 21% | 33% |
Black | 5% | 2% |
Asian | 53% | 39% |
With Kids | 39% | 34% |
Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
Rentals | 34% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or South San Francisco?
A: Union City has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 74354 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 34% for Union City versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z