Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to South Pasadena
This post compares Union City, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Union City (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 74,354 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $55,732 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $928,500 |
White | 21% | 54% |
Black | 5% | 3% |
Asian | 53% | 29% |
With Kids | 39% | 34% |
Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
Rentals | 34% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or South Pasadena?
A: Union City has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 74354 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z