Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Union City, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $374,600 |
| White | 21% | 81% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 53% | 3% |
| With Kids | 39% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 34% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Union City has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 74354 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z