Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to San Francisco
This post compares Union City, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $927,400 |
| White | 21% | 47% |
| Black | 5% | 5% |
| Asian | 53% | 34% |
| With Kids | 39% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 34% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or San Francisco?
A: Union City has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 74354 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z