Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to San Fernando
This post compares Union City, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $370,300 |
| White | 21% | 57% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 53% | 1% |
| With Kids | 39% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 33 |
| Rentals | 34% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or San Fernando?
A: Union City has a larger population count than San Fernando: 74354 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z