Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Union City, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $444,200 |
| White | 21% | 62% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 53% | 13% |
| With Kids | 39% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 34% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Union City has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 74354 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 34% for Union City versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z