Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to Palm Springs
This post compares Union City, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $340,600 |
| White | 21% | 83% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 53% | 4% |
| With Kids | 39% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 54 |
| Rentals | 34% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or Palm Springs?
A: Union City has a larger population count than Palm Springs: 74354 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z