Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to Highland
This post compares Union City, California to Highland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | Highland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 54,704 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $44,274 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $288,500 |
| White | 21% | 58% |
| Black | 5% | 8% |
| Asian | 53% | 9% |
| With Kids | 39% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 32 |
| Rentals | 34% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or Highland?
A: Union City has a larger population count than Highland: 74354 compared with 54704 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in Highland?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or Highland?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Highland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 34% for Union City versus 35% for Highland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z