Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to Foothill Farms
This post compares Union City, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $201,200 |
| White | 21% | 67% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 53% | 5% |
| With Kids | 39% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 33 |
| Rentals | 34% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or Foothill Farms?
A: Union City has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 74354 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z