Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to Fairfield
This post compares Union City, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | Fairfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 112,790 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $51,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $341,500 |
| White | 21% | 46% |
| Black | 5% | 14% |
| Asian | 53% | 17% |
| With Kids | 39% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 34% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or Fairfield?
A: Union City has a smaller population count than Fairfield: 74354 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z