Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to Chino Hills
This post compares Union City, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $567,200 |
| White | 21% | 46% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 53% | 33% |
| With Kids | 39% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 34% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or Chino Hills?
A: Union City has a similar population count than Chino Hills: 74354 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Union City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z