Compare-Cities.com
Compare Union City to Beverly Hills
This post compares Union City, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Union City (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74,354 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $55,732 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $620,200 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 21% | 82% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 53% | 9% |
| With Kids | 39% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 43 |
| Rentals | 34% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Union City or Beverly Hills?
A: Union City has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 74354 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Union City or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Union City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Union City or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Union City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Union City versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Union City may include: Daly-City, Milpitas, and Diamond-Bar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z