Compare-Cities.com
Compare Twentynine Palms to South San Francisco
This post compares Twentynine Palms, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Twentynine Palms (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,995 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $30,069 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $120,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 70% | 33% |
| Black | 10% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 40% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 39 |
| Rentals | 71% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Twentynine Palms or South San Francisco?
A: Twentynine Palms has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 25995 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Twentynine Palms or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Twentynine Palms.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Twentynine Palms or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Twentynine Palms.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Twentynine Palms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 71% for Twentynine Palms versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Twentynine Palms may include: North-Highlands, Merced, and Barstow.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z