Compare-Cities.com
Compare Tulare to Reedley
This post compares Tulare, California to Reedley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Tulare (city) | Reedley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,296 | 25,419 |
| Income (median) | $36,587 | $32,215 |
| Home Value (median) | $177,500 | $174,100 |
| White | 78% | 73% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 3% |
| With Kids | 48% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 31 |
| Rentals | 44% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Tulare or Reedley?
A: Tulare has a larger population count than Reedley: 62296 compared with 25419 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Tulare or in Reedley?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Tulare.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Tulare or Reedley?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Tulare.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Tulare does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Tulare versus 38% for Reedley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Tulare may include: Porterville, Hesperia, and Sanger.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z