Compare-Cities.com
Compare Tulare to Fresno
This post compares Tulare, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Tulare (city) | Fresno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,296 | 519,037 |
| Income (median) | $36,587 | $39,069 |
| Home Value (median) | $177,500 | $206,800 |
| White | 78% | 56% |
| Black | 3% | 7% |
| Asian | 2% | 13% |
| With Kids | 48% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 30 |
| Rentals | 44% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Tulare or Fresno?
A: Tulare has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 62296 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Tulare or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Tulare.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Tulare or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Tulare.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Tulare versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Tulare may include: Porterville, Hesperia, and Sanger.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z