Compare-Cities.com
Compare Tulare to Foothill Farms
This post compares Tulare, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Tulare (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,296 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $36,587 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $177,500 | $201,200 |
| White | 78% | 67% |
| Black | 3% | 9% |
| Asian | 2% | 5% |
| With Kids | 48% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 33 |
| Rentals | 44% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Tulare or Foothill Farms?
A: Tulare has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 62296 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Tulare or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Tulare.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Tulare or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Tulare.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Tulare versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Tulare may include: Porterville, Hesperia, and Sanger.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z