Compare-Cities.com
Compare Tulare to Beverly Hills
This post compares Tulare, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Tulare (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,296 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $36,587 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $177,500 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 78% | 82% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 9% |
| With Kids | 48% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 43 |
| Rentals | 44% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Tulare or Beverly Hills?
A: Tulare has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 62296 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Tulare or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Tulare.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Tulare or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Tulare.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Tulare versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Tulare may include: Porterville, Hesperia, and Sanger.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z