Compare-Cities.com
Compare Tulare to Belmont
This post compares Tulare, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Tulare (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,296 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $36,587 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $177,500 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 78% | 62% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 27% |
| With Kids | 48% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 39 |
| Rentals | 44% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Tulare or Belmont?
A: Tulare has a larger population count than Belmont: 62296 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Tulare or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Tulare.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Tulare or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Tulare.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Tulare does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Tulare versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Tulare may include: Porterville, Hesperia, and Sanger.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z