Compare-Cities.com
Compare Tulare to Bakersfield
This post compares Tulare, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Tulare (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,296 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $36,587 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $177,500 | $228,400 |
| White | 78% | 68% |
| Black | 3% | 7% |
| Asian | 2% | 7% |
| With Kids | 48% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 30 |
| Rentals | 44% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Tulare or Bakersfield?
A: Tulare has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 62296 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Tulare or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Tulare.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Tulare or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Tulare.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Tulare does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Tulare versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Tulare may include: Porterville, Hesperia, and Sanger.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z