Compare-Cities.com
Compare Tracy to South San Francisco
This post compares Tracy, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Tracy (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,613 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $54,706 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $378,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 58% | 33% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 15% | 39% |
| With Kids | 51% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Tracy or South San Francisco?
A: Tracy has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 87613 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Tracy or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Tracy.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Tracy or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Tracy.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Tracy versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Tracy may include: Murrieta, Antelope, and Highland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z