Compare-Cities.com
Compare Torrance to South San Francisco
This post compares Torrance, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Torrance (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 147,190 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $66,475 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $687,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 49% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 35% | 39% |
| With Kids | 31% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Torrance or South San Francisco?
A: Torrance has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 147190 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Torrance or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Torrance.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Torrance or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Torrance.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Torrance does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Torrance versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Torrance may include: San-Bruno, Alameda, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z