Compare-Cities.com
Compare Torrance to Foothill Farms
This post compares Torrance, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Torrance (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 147,190 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $66,475 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $687,900 | $201,200 |
| White | 49% | 67% |
| Black | 2% | 9% |
| Asian | 35% | 5% |
| With Kids | 31% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 45% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Torrance or Foothill Farms?
A: Torrance has a much larger population count than Foothill Farms: 147190 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Torrance or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Torrance.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Torrance or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Torrance.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Torrance versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Torrance may include: San-Bruno, Alameda, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z