Compare-Cities.com
Compare Torrance to Baldwin Park
This post compares Torrance, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Torrance (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 147,190 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $66,475 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $687,900 | $357,500 |
| White | 49% | 34% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 35% | 18% |
| With Kids | 31% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 45% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Torrance or Baldwin Park?
A: Torrance has a larger population count than Baldwin Park: 147190 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Torrance or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Torrance.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Torrance or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Torrance.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Torrance does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Torrance versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Torrance may include: San-Bruno, Alameda, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z