Compare-Cities.com
Compare Temescal Valley to South San Francisco
This post compares Temescal Valley, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Temescal Valley (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,411 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $66,775 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,200 | $697,400 |
| White | 65% | 33% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 8% | 39% |
| With Kids | 39% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 14% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Temescal Valley or South San Francisco?
A: Temescal Valley has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 25411 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Temescal Valley or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Temescal Valley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Temescal Valley or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Temescal Valley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 14% for Temescal Valley versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Temescal Valley may include: Brentwood, Norco, and Oakley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z