Compare-Cities.com
Compare Temecula to Foothill Farms
This post compares Temecula, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Temecula (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110,722 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $59,886 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $394,600 | $201,200 |
| White | 69% | 67% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 9% | 5% |
| With Kids | 45% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 35% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Temecula or Foothill Farms?
A: Temecula has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 110722 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Temecula or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Temecula.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Temecula or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Temecula.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Temecula versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Temecula may include: Murrieta, Manteca, and Corona.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z