Compare-Cities.com
Compare Stockton to South San Francisco
This post compares Stockton, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Stockton (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 304,358 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $40,298 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $220,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 43% | 33% |
| Black | 11% | 2% |
| Asian | 21% | 39% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 52% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Stockton or South San Francisco?
A: Stockton has a much larger population count than South San Francisco: 304358 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Stockton or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Stockton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Stockton or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Stockton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Stockton does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Stockton versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Stockton may include: Hayward, Fairfield, and Florin.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z