Compare-Cities.com
Compare Stockton to South Pasadena
This post compares Stockton, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Stockton (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 304,358 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $40,298 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $220,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 43% | 54% |
| Black | 11% | 3% |
| Asian | 21% | 29% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 52% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Stockton or South Pasadena?
A: Stockton has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 304358 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Stockton or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Stockton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Stockton or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Stockton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 52% for Stockton versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Stockton may include: Hayward, Fairfield, and Florin.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z