Compare-Cities.com
Compare Stockton to San Francisco
This post compares Stockton, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Stockton (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 304,358 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $40,298 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $220,600 | $927,400 |
| White | 43% | 47% |
| Black | 11% | 5% |
| Asian | 21% | 34% |
| With Kids | 42% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 52% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Stockton or San Francisco?
A: Stockton has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 304358 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Stockton or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Stockton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Stockton or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Stockton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Stockton versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Stockton may include: Hayward, Fairfield, and Florin.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z