Compare-Cities.com
Compare Stockton to Redlands
This post compares Stockton, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Stockton (city) | Redlands (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 304,358 | 70,765 |
Income (median) | $40,298 | $54,151 |
Home Value (median) | $220,600 | $350,900 |
White | 43% | 71% |
Black | 11% | 7% |
Asian | 21% | 7% |
With Kids | 42% | 33% |
Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
Rentals | 52% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Stockton or Redlands?
A: Stockton has a much larger population count than Redlands: 304358 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Stockton or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Stockton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Stockton or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Stockton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Stockton does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Stockton versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Stockton may include: Hayward, Fairfield, and Florin.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z