Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Jose Hills to South San Francisco
This post compares South San Jose Hills, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Jose Hills (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,423 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $31,494 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $322,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 36% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 10% | 39% |
| With Kids | 54% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 28% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Jose Hills or South San Francisco?
A: South San Jose Hills has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 20423 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Jose Hills or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Jose Hills or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for South San Jose Hills versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Jose Hills may include: Valinda, La-Puente, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z