Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Jose Hills to Santa Paula
This post compares South San Jose Hills, California to Santa Paula, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Jose Hills (CDP) | Santa Paula (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,423 | 30,344 |
| Income (median) | $31,494 | $36,718 |
| Home Value (median) | $322,800 | $349,500 |
| White | 36% | 85% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 10% | 1% |
| With Kids | 54% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 28% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Jose Hills or Santa Paula?
A: South San Jose Hills has a smaller population count than Santa Paula: 20423 compared with 30344 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Jose Hills or in Santa Paula?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Jose Hills or Santa Paula?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Paula does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for South San Jose Hills versus 45% for Santa Paula.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Jose Hills may include: Valinda, La-Puente, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z