Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Jose Hills to Redlands
This post compares South San Jose Hills, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Jose Hills (CDP) | Redlands (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,423 | 70,765 |
| Income (median) | $31,494 | $54,151 |
| Home Value (median) | $322,800 | $350,900 |
| White | 36% | 71% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 10% | 7% |
| With Kids | 54% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 28% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Jose Hills or Redlands?
A: South San Jose Hills has a much smaller population count than Redlands: 20423 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Jose Hills or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Jose Hills or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for South San Jose Hills versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Jose Hills may include: Valinda, La-Puente, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z