Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Jose Hills to Porterville
This post compares South San Jose Hills, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Jose Hills (CDP) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,423 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $31,494 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $322,800 | $163,100 |
| White | 36% | 77% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 10% | 4% |
| With Kids | 54% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 28% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Jose Hills or Porterville?
A: South San Jose Hills has a much smaller population count than Porterville: 20423 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Jose Hills or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Jose Hills or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for South San Jose Hills versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Jose Hills may include: Valinda, La-Puente, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z