Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Jose Hills to Pacifica
This post compares South San Jose Hills, California to Pacifica, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Jose Hills (CDP) | Pacifica (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,423 | 39,141 |
| Income (median) | $31,494 | $68,966 |
| Home Value (median) | $322,800 | $740,700 |
| White | 36% | 63% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 10% | 19% |
| With Kids | 54% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 42 |
| Rentals | 28% | 31% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Jose Hills or Pacifica?
A: South San Jose Hills has a smaller population count than Pacifica: 20423 compared with 39141 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Jose Hills or in Pacifica?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Jose Hills or Pacifica?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pacifica does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 28% for South San Jose Hills versus 31% for Pacifica.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Jose Hills may include: Valinda, La-Puente, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z