Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Jose Hills to North Highlands
This post compares South San Jose Hills, California to North Highlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Jose Hills (CDP) | North Highlands (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,423 | 47,357 |
| Income (median) | $31,494 | $35,489 |
| Home Value (median) | $322,800 | $168,300 |
| White | 36% | 65% |
| Black | 1% | 13% |
| Asian | 10% | 6% |
| With Kids | 54% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 31 |
| Rentals | 28% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Jose Hills or North Highlands?
A: South San Jose Hills has a much smaller population count than North Highlands: 20423 compared with 47357 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Jose Hills or in North Highlands?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Jose Hills or North Highlands?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for South San Jose Hills versus 57% for North Highlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Jose Hills may include: Valinda, La-Puente, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z