Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Jose Hills to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares South San Jose Hills, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Jose Hills (CDP) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,423 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $31,494 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $322,800 | $154,600 |
| White | 36% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 10% | 2% |
| With Kids | 54% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 28% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Jose Hills or Desert Hot Springs?
A: South San Jose Hills has a smaller population count than Desert Hot Springs: 20423 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Jose Hills or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Jose Hills or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for South San Jose Hills versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Jose Hills may include: Valinda, La-Puente, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z