Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Jose Hills to Cathedral City
This post compares South San Jose Hills, California to Cathedral City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Jose Hills (CDP) | Cathedral City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,423 | 53,733 |
| Income (median) | $31,494 | $33,790 |
| Home Value (median) | $322,800 | $232,400 |
| White | 36% | 76% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 10% | 4% |
| With Kids | 54% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 37 |
| Rentals | 28% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Jose Hills or Cathedral City?
A: South San Jose Hills has a much smaller population count than Cathedral City: 20423 compared with 53733 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Jose Hills or in Cathedral City?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Jose Hills or Cathedral City?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Jose Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cathedral City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for South San Jose Hills versus 39% for Cathedral City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Jose Hills may include: Valinda, La-Puente, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z