Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Westminster
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Westminster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Westminster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 91,785 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $43,283 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $546,200 |
| White | 33% | 39% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 39% | 48% |
| With Kids | 34% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 41 |
| Rentals | 38% | 47% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Westminster?
A: South San Francisco has a smaller population count than Westminster: 67120 compared with 91785 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Westminster?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Westminster?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Westminster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 47% for Westminster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z