Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to West Hollywood
This post compares South San Francisco, California to West Hollywood, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | West Hollywood (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 36,148 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $63,795 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $684,200 |
| White | 33% | 79% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 39% | 5% |
| With Kids | 34% | 3% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 78% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or West Hollywood?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than West Hollywood: 67120 compared with 36148 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in West Hollywood?
A: Incomes are on average lower in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or West Hollywood?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: West Hollywood does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 78% for West Hollywood.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z