Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Twentynine Palms
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Twentynine Palms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Twentynine Palms (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 25,995 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $30,069 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $120,900 |
| White | 33% | 70% |
| Black | 2% | 10% |
| Asian | 39% | 3% |
| With Kids | 34% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 24 |
| Rentals | 38% | 71% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Twentynine Palms?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than Twentynine Palms: 67120 compared with 25995 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Twentynine Palms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Twentynine Palms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Twentynine Palms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 71% for Twentynine Palms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z