Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares South San Francisco, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,120 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $52,696 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $374,600 |
| White | 33% | 81% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 39% | 3% |
| With Kids | 34% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 38% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or South Lake Tahoe?
A: South San Francisco has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 67120 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average higher in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z