Compare-Cities.com
Compare South San Francisco to Santa Rosa
This post compares South San Francisco, California to Santa Rosa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | South San Francisco (city) | Santa Rosa (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 67,120 | 174,244 |
Income (median) | $52,696 | $48,146 |
Home Value (median) | $697,400 | $458,500 |
White | 33% | 68% |
Black | 2% | 2% |
Asian | 39% | 5% |
With Kids | 34% | 30% |
Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
Rentals | 38% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South San Francisco or Santa Rosa?
A: South San Francisco has a much smaller population count than Santa Rosa: 67120 compared with 174244 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South San Francisco or in Santa Rosa?
A: Incomes are on average similar in South San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South San Francisco or Santa Rosa?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in South San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Rosa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for South San Francisco versus 46% for Santa Rosa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South San Francisco may include: Newark, Westminster, and West-Covina.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z